World of Warcraft

1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 . 13 . 14 . 15 . 16 . 17 . 18 . 19 . 20 . 21 . 22 . 23 . 24 . 25 . 26
71
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Cenarius
  • 60. Re: Lifetap change reverted   03/05/2008 02:33:59 PM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
W00T?

My Warlock is so overpowered that his felhunter is the monster from Cloverfield.
-Arkade, Daggerspine
79
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Aegwynn
  • 61. Re: Lifetap change reverted   03/05/2008 02:35:35 PM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
This makes me happy in the pants.

PTR is good for some things afterall!
70
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 62. Re: Lifetap change reverted   03/05/2008 02:46:07 PM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
So are we focusing on the dk nerf or pet scaling or some other issue next?
70
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 63. Re: Lifetap change reverted   03/05/2008 02:47:27 PM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • The Scryers
  • 64. Re: Lifetap change reverted   03/05/2008 02:55:28 PM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
'bout time they came to their senses.

Urrlyx the Destructor, Warchief of the Order of Chaos
Spreading shadow across the land
70
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 65. Re: Lifetap change reverted   03/05/2008 03:01:34 PM PST
limit-reached limit-reached

Q u o t e:
What? No trap card?

I'd like to get excited over this but lifetap has been changed on test what? 6 times?


^^ Max lulz ^^


any way im happy with the revert, but i still want better pet scaling. >_> just think its something we deserve....but again i just think

but thx Blizz...unless you really do have a trap card your gunna activate in a few turn....I mean...patches.
70
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Scarlet Crusade
  • 66. Re: Lifetap change reverted   03/05/2008 03:03:18 PM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
*weeps with joy*

Thank you... *openly sobs for a few minutes*

    Fall Guard
    Good:
    -Can run quickly and beat your companion in running races, potato-sack races, jog races, master races etc.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Kil'jaeden
  • 67. Re: Lifetap change reverted   03/05/2008 03:08:37 PM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
"Instead of patching lifetap, we decided it was SO bad, we hotfixed it!"

/shudder
70
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 68. Re: Lifetap change reverted   03/05/2008 03:16:35 PM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
LOL. It was an illogical change. GG.

¤ Current: 70 Undead Warlock [Stormscale] ¤
¤ Retired: 70 Mage, 70 Shaman, 60 Warlock, 60 Rogue ¤
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 69. Re: Lifetap change reverted   03/05/2008 03:18:49 PM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
Thank you Blizzard.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Black Dragonflight
  • 70. Re: Lifetap change reverted   03/05/2008 03:22:12 PM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
woooot

/i hope
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Silvermoon
  • 72. Re: Lifetap change reverted   03/05/2008 03:29:50 PM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
BLIZZARD I LOVE YOU ONCE AGAIN!

In a non-weird way, that is >.>

FOR PONY
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 73. Re: Lifetap change reverted   03/05/2008 03:31:34 PM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
Now if they just nerf-downranking (something they've done with most other classes) the world would be a happy place.
Blizzard Entertainment
View All Posts by This User ignore-inactive
Kalgan
Blizzard Poster
  • 74. Re: Lifetap change reverted   03/05/2008 03:32:24 PM PST
limit-reached limit-reached

Q u o t e:
1st page.


Big win if it makes it to live untouched, but I'll reserve judgement on 2.4 till it's finalized. Who knows what other nerf they might decide to toss on us to compensate for reverting back lifetap. Hell, they might even consider it a warlock buff, justifying nerfing us somewhere else.



No other warlock nerfs are planned for 2.4. One of the things we look at is class representation in arenas (although normalized for class popularity). In this particular chart, a value of 100% means the class is represented as we'd expect, a value over 100% means the class is represented that much more often than we'd expect, a value below 100% means they're represented less than we'd want (obviously this chart doesn't include a spec breakdown in any way).

         2v2     3v3     5v5

Druid 276.0% 184.0% 80.5%
Hunter 43.0% 50.2% 43.0%
Mage 8.7% 96.0% 96.0%
Paladin 19.7% 29.5% 147.4%
Priest 113.3% 164.8% 185.4%
Shaman 37.8% 50.4% 138.6%
Rogue 144.2% 175.1% 61.8%
Warlock 149.2% 93.2% 111.9%
Warrior 130.4% 90.7% 79.3%


Locks are doing pretty well overall, but what had us worried was that it appeared to us a month ago or so as though warlocks were on an uptrend. However, the evidence is strong that that trend is reversing, which means significant nerfs aren't really what we want right now (we really don't know where those numbers will settle down).

Edit: one other detail regarding the chart, this one is set at 2200+ rating.

[ Post edited by Kalgan ]

70
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 75. Re: Lifetap change reverted   03/05/2008 03:32:44 PM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 77. Re: Lifetap change reverted   03/05/2008 03:34:50 PM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
Zomg, Kalgan in the warlock forums!

Oh, and thank god you came to your senses and reverted this.


Is pet scaling going to be looked at at all? I don't care for PvP, but DK is another unnecessary PvE adjustment. Any chance of having +hit scaling on the pet to compensate for the small loss of dps in PvE?
66
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Tortheldrin
  • 79. Re: Lifetap change reverted   03/05/2008 03:35:01 PM PST
limit-reached limit-reached

Q u o t e:



No other warlock nerfs are planned for 2.4. One of the things we look at is class representation in arenas (although normalized for class popularity). In this particular chart, a value of 100% means the class is represented as we'd expect, a value over 100% means the class is represented that much more often than we'd expect, a value below 100% means they're represented less than we'd want (obviously this chart doesn't include a spec breakdown in any way).

         2v2     3v3     5v5

Druid 276.0% 184.0% 80.5%
Hunter 43.0% 50.2% 43.0%
Mage 8.7% 96.0% 96.0%
Paladin 19.7% 29.5% 147.4%
Priest 113.3% 164.8% 185.4%
Shaman 37.8% 50.4% 138.6%
Rogue 144.2% 175.1% 61.8%
Warlock 149.2% 93.2% 111.9%
Warrior 130.4% 90.7% 79.3%


Locks are doing pretty well overall, but what had us worried was that it appeared to us a month ago or so as though warlocks were on an uptrend. However, the evidence is strong that that trend is reversing, which means significant nerfs aren't really what we want right now (we really don't know where those numbers will settle down).

Edit: one other detail regarding the chart, this one is set at 2200+ rating.


So it sounds like you are going to nerf preists again....

Shaddow needs buffs not nerfs :(
1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 . 13 . 14 . 15 . 16 . 17 . 18 . 19 . 20 . 21 . 22 . 23 . 24 . 25 . 26
Forum Nav : Jump To This Forum
Blizzard Entertainment