World of Warcraft

1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 . 13 . 14 . 15 . 16 . 17 . 18 . 19 . 20 . 21 . 22 . 23 . 24 . 25 . 26
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 0. Hemo doesn't need to be nerfed.   12/05/2007 10:07:57 AM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
It's powerful, but not overpowered. And we've only had it 2 weeks. :*(
70
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 1. Re: Hemo doesn't need to be nerfed.   12/05/2007 10:36:03 AM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
i agree

blizz was trying so hard to save the sub tree and the 125% wep dmg is what saved it

12
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Scilla
  • 2. Re: Hemo doesn't need to be nerfed.   12/05/2007 10:40:40 AM PST
limit-reached limit-reached

Q u o t e:
i agree

blizz was trying so hard to save the sub tree and the 125% wep dmg is what saved it




But now you can stick a fork in it because Hemo is done.
Blizzard Entertainment
View All Posts by This User ignore-inactive
Nethaera
Blizzard Poster
  • 4. Re: Hemo doesn't need to be nerfed.   12/05/2007 10:45:47 AM PST
limit-reached limit-reached

Q u o t e:
It's powerful, but not overpowered. And we've only had it 2 weeks. :*(


I understand the concern that you have for this. I would urge you to please test out the change on the PTR when you get the chance and give feedback on it there.

The intent at this point with this change is to remove some of the front load damage in favor of more group utility. This was the intention of the original Hemorrhage buff and we're working toward getting it back where we feel it's going to be the most balanced and beneficial both. That said, we are always on the lookout for constructive feedback on these changes.

Nothing endures but change.
- Heraclitus
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 5. Re: Hemo doesn't need to be nerfed.   12/05/2007 10:47:42 AM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
I can't think of anything to say.

Redoran - 70 Druid
Leviathan - 70 Mage
Balmora - 70 Hunter
Balmora - 6X Pally
Marbule - 6X Priest
70
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 9. Re: Hemo doesn't need to be nerfed.   12/05/2007 10:50:33 AM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
-15% DMG is so worth +1 physical dmg for the RAID! Now that's UTILITY, baby!
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Mal'Ganis
  • 11. Re: Hemo doesn't need to be nerfed.   12/05/2007 10:51:17 AM PST
limit-reached limit-reached
hemo is hardly utility of any kind. it's like trying to pee on a california fire.
70
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Alexstrasza
  • 12. Re: Hemo doesn't need to be nerfed.   12/05/2007 10:52:19 AM PST
limit-reached limit-reached

Q u o t e:
Hemorrhage is a terrible form of utility. Just scrap that idea because putting points deep into Subtlety greatly reduces your long term sustained damage enough to where the Hemorrhage debuff does not make up for your personal damage lost.


Yeah, but the flipside is that it did make for it and do roughly the same damage overall as combat swords, everyone would switch to Hemo because of the fun/useful talents early in the Sub tree (Camo/MoD).
71
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 13. Re: Hemo doesn't need to be nerfed.   12/05/2007 10:53:41 AM PST
limit-reached limit-reached

Q u o t e:
Any nerf to rogues is a step in the right direction.
says the druid...
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Cenarion Circle
  • 14. Re: Hemo doesn't need to be nerfed.   12/05/2007 10:54:42 AM PST
limit-reached limit-reached

Q u o t e:
I understand the concern that you have for this. I would urge you to please test out the change on the PTR when you get the chance and give feedback on it there.

The intent at this point with this change is to remove some of the front load damage in favor of more group utility. This was the intention of the original Hemorrhage buff and we're working toward getting it back where we feel it's going to be the most balanced and beneficial both. That said, we are always on the lookout for constructive feedback on these changes.

Unfortunately the group utility comes at the cost of soloing speed. Any chance of a compromise at 120% and 41 damage?

(Also, reduce the Shadowstep cooldown to 15 secs.)

..(>'o')> (::) <('o'<)..
<Cult of Cookies>
Pbbbbbbbbbbbtt!!
60
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 15. Re: Hemo doesn't need to be nerfed.   12/05/2007 10:55:24 AM PST
limit-reached limit-reached

Q u o t e:


I understand the concern that you have for this. I would urge you to please test out the change on the PTR when you get the chance and give feedback on it there.

The intent at this point with this change is to remove some of the front load damage in favor of more group utility. This was the intention of the original Hemorrhage buff and we're working toward getting it back where we feel it's going to be the most balanced and beneficial both. That said, we are always on the lookout for constructive feedback on these changes.


Neth, 37dmg debuff is grp utility?

I prefer my combat build.

1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 . 13 . 14 . 15 . 16 . 17 . 18 . 19 . 20 . 21 . 22 . 23 . 24 . 25 . 26
Forum Nav : Jump To This Forum
Blizzard Entertainment