Anyone else noticed their warrior-related threads disappearing? I suspected this had been the case when I came to the forums and only saw like 2-3 threads regarding the outrageous state of warriors at the moment. Then it was confirmed when a post I made yesterday was deleted.

Blzzard- If you don't want to see or have to moderate warrior threads, balance the class. It's not that hard and I don't understand why we've had to go through this for 2 xpacs now while you nerf classes like priest/mage/ret overnight.

Just playing devils advocate - have you considered that maybe, just maybe, warriors are right about where the devs want them to be?

I mean, look at the PTR notes up to this point.

Have you considered that you broke forum rules?

You might give it a think, since you're doing it again.

"Nerf Warrior damage by 30% kthnx" is not a legitimate thread.

Requesting ideas to fix a broken class isn't breaking any forum rules I'm aware of. And I HIGHLY doubt that between the three of you there's a single team above 1200 so, respectfully, I doubt you have any idea where warriors really are in pvp.

---

Q u o t e:
Requesting ideas to fix a broken class isn't breaking any forum rules I'm aware of. And I HIGHLY doubt that between the three of you there's a single team above 1200 so, respectfully, I doubt you have any idea where warriors really are in pvp.

---

The irony of someone without the balls to post on their main telling other people they suck is amazing.

---

Q u o t e:
Just playing devils advocate - have you considered that maybe, just maybe, warriors are right about where the devs want them to be?

I mean, look at the PTR notes up to this point.

---

Not a reason to delete discussion of the topic though.

---

Q u o t e:
Requesting ideas to fix a broken class isn't breaking any forum rules I'm aware of. And I HIGHLY doubt that between the three of you there's a single team above 1200 so, respectfully, I doubt you have any idea where warriors really are in pvp.

---

How's PVP at 55? Must be pretty hard!

Warriors are bad with bad gear and great with great gear. A mechanic such as this is difficult to balance however in the current game's state, taking the average warrior population, warriors are essentially balanced. Have you noticed how all ice crown patch notes that have come out as of late include literally nothing pertaining to warriors? That MUST mean they're totally not working as blizzard intended huh?

warriors r fine.
qq about warriors is fine
saying "OMG i sat in a bladestorm and got hurt nerf warrior dmg by 30%" isnt fine

---

Q u o t e:

How's PVP at 55? Must be pretty hard!

Warriors are bad with bad gear and great with great gear. A mechanic such as this is difficult to balance however in the current game's state, taking the average warrior population, warriors are essentially balanced. Have you noticed how all ice crown patch notes that have come out as of late include literally nothing pertaining to warriors? That MUST mean they're totally not working as blizzard intended huh?

---

Warriors arent great with great gear
They are OP

You've been trolling this topic for a couple days now, are you asking for a ban?

On the topic, have a look at patch notes for 3.3. It seems Warriors are pretty much right where Blizz wants us. Personally, I'd like to see a slight increase in single target DPS while perhaps giving up a bit on our "Cleave Fight Niche".

PvP wise we're fine. We are not overrepresented, in fact last I looked we were right around 10% of top teams, which would make us entirely...average don't ya think?

What really amuses me is these QQ threads which stem from the fact that until warriors are overgeared and well-played, we're essentially a free HK. Once we gear up and "l2P" we are indeed a class to be reconed with, but given the skill cap on Warrior PvP I'd certainly say we're far from overpowered.

inc flames on my lack of arena teams...I must be a bad.

Warriors know. They see all. Secretly they have been reporting all warrior QQ threads so they are promptly deleted. We shall not live with this warrior oppression! Stand and fight my fellow non-warriors!

People routinely complain about every class. Sometimes a "majority" is reached and actions are taken because of it...

That said, I doubt they were deleted simply because they were Warrior threads - it was probably more about the presentation instead of the merits of Warrior PvP.

---

Q u o t e:
Requesting ideas to fix a broken class isn't breaking any forum rules I'm aware of. And I HIGHLY doubt that between the three of you there's a single team above 1200 so, respectfully, I doubt you have any idea where warriors really are in pvp.

---

post on ur main with the qq....


alts that qq dont get bliz attention.

*sigh* yes, its clearly a conspiracy against the Warrior class. Blizzard really doesn't have anything better to do but specifically target Warriors on the forums and ensure their voices aren't heard.

---

Q u o t e:
*sigh* yes, its clearly a conspiracy against the Warrior class. Blizzard really doesn't have anything better to do but specifically target Warriors on the forums and ensure their voices aren't heard.

---

OP wanted 30% damage nerf and charge in combat gone


lolumad?


might aswell delete warrior from the game then.

---

Q u o t e:



OP wanted 30% damage nerf and charge in combat gone


lolumad?


might aswell delete warrior from the game then.

---

Oh, well then its clearly a conspiracy by Blizzard to silence everyone else! COMMENCE MASS HYSTERIA!

Looking at the OPs post history, he seems to have something of a hard on for wanting to nerf Warriors.

---

Q u o t e:



OP wanted 30% damage nerf and charge in combat gone


lolumad?


might aswell delete warrior from the game then.

---

Kind of what they're shooting for. At a guess.

---

Q u o t e:


Kind of what they're shooting for. At a guess.

---

I'd wanna be deleted if I were as bad as you, that's for sure.