121. Re: Why these warlock changes? 10/20/2009 12:42:06 PM PDT
Q u o t e:
lol, step into an arena kid
sure i am exxagerating 2 shot (actually not really, i do get 2 shot by them semi-frequently) but you get the gist, wearing 200 more resilience will not stop you from getting gibbed by facerolling destro locks
if i me and my partner are not constantly LOSing the warlock he will eventually land a conflag-cbolt and rng gib me
You sir, fail at this game. btw, post on your main so we can laugh at your stats/rating. Dumb troll.
122. Re: Why these warlock changes? 10/20/2009 01:42:00 PM PDT
Q u o t e: people "running" when feared is a good thing, since DISTANCE is key. Melee right on us ==> bad.
If it would stun only...melee would still sit on top of us a second later.
I personally dont find it hard to strafe left. I really dont see a problem with melee standing on me if they keep getting our beloved "cant do that while stunned". If they're not doing anything, casting from a distance only reduces burst through travel time, AND allows them run behind stuff and out of range. If they WALKED away, however, would be another story.
Personally i dont see great benefit in distance now days... charge/vanish/death grip etc means they will reopen. But to each his own I guess...
What I'm arguing is that we need a shorter CC that doesn't break, rather than one that is supposed to be 10 secs but effectively lasts 1 cast or less.
I have 22k HP more or less, in the 8 seconds a rogue has me stunned if my trink is down he takes me 100 - 0. I believe we need an even standing mechanic to lock him down and force him to eat 22k worth of burst before it breaks unless he trinks. Balance, in simple terms.
