World of Warcraft - English (NA) Forums -> Warrior t10 set contains questionable imagery

Cheefinlol

< ExcIusive >

Mannoroth

0. Warrior t10 set contains questionable imagery 10/09/2009 09:14:11 AM PDT

Blizzard has recently given us a sneak preview of the new warrior t10 sets and I know I can't be the only one who thought they looked a little off. You be the judge:

blizzard page of the preview(note the shoulders):
http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/underdev/3p3/tier10sneak.html

zoomed in version:
http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/5097/warriort10.jpg

There are children that play this game and I think blizzard really should re-design these shoulders, they are not appropriate.

Alastrai

Illidan

1. Re: Warrior t10 set contains questionable ima 10/09/2009 09:15:34 AM PDT

really man? really?

http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Illidan&n=Zareline

Erenicus

< Adamant >

Moon Guard

2. Re: Warrior t10 set contains questionable ima 10/09/2009 09:16:56 AM PDT

Q u o t e:
Blizzard has recently given us a sneak preview of the new warrior t10 sets and I know I can't be the only one who thought they looked a little off. You be the judge:

blizzard page of the preview(note the shoulders):
http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/underdev/3p3/tier10sneak.html

zoomed in version:
http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/5097/warriort10.jpg

There are children that play this game and I think blizzard really should re-design these shoulders, they are not appropriate.

This game is rated T for a reason, you know. Jus' sayin.

Erenicus-80 belf ret paladin
Teslann-80 nelf resto druid
Alithvia-60 belf rogue

Bubble-hearth ftw.

Danaila

< Mylenate My Axon >

Draenor

4. Re: Warrior t10 set contains questionable ima 10/09/2009 09:21:05 AM PDT

What am I looking at?

Valcarde

< Order of the Damned >

Bronzebeard

5. Re: Warrior t10 set contains questionable ima 10/09/2009 09:22:13 AM PDT

What I wouldn't give for the facepalm Ascii right now.

[2.Trade] Arthas: WTB [Central Heating] for Froz.Throne, Engineer link Plz, PST

Alastrai

Illidan

7. Re: Warrior t10 set contains questionable ima 10/09/2009 09:23:07 AM PDT

Q u o t e:
What I wouldn't give for the facepalm Ascii right now.

............................................________
....................................,.-‘”...................``~.,
.............................,.-”...................................“-.,
.........................,/...............................................”:,
.....................,?......................................................,
.................../...........................................................,}
................./......................................................,:`^`..}
.............../...................................................,:”........./
..............?.....__.........................................:`.........../
............./__.(.....“~-,_..............................,:`........../
.........../(_....”~,_........~,_....................,:`........_/
..........{.._$;_......”=,_.......-,_.......,.-~-,},.~”;/....}
...........((.....*~_.......”=-._......“;,,./`..../”............../
...,,,___.`~,......“~.,....................`.....}............../
............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-”
............/.`~,......`-...................................../
.............`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....,__
,,_..........}.>-._...................................|..............`=~-,
.....`=~-,__......`,.................................
...................`=~-,,.,...............................
................................`:,,...........................`..............__
.....................................`=-,...................,%`>--==``
........................................_..........._,-%.......`
...................................,

[ Post edited by Alastrai ]

http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Illidan&n=Zareline

Ramoc

< B O H I C A >

Bloodscalp

8. Re: Warrior t10 set contains questionable ima 10/09/2009 09:23:24 AM PDT

they're blunt spikes, grow up

goblins > gnomes. now the alliance can feel what its like to be ganked by a 2 foot-tall rogue. and ours will smoke cigars while doing it.

Ënmity

< Imperium >

Borean Tundra

9. Re: Warrior t10 set contains questionable ima 10/09/2009 09:24:13 AM PDT

Q u o t e:
There are children that play this game and I think blizzard really should re-design these shoulders, they are not appropriate.

There are normal people who play this game, and I really think you should reconsider the way you try to find dirty imagery in otherwise benign photographs.

╬╦╩╦╩╦╩╦╩╦╩╦╩╦╩╦╩╦╩╦╩╦╩╦╬
╣▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄╠
╠ ▐░ ~ Hatred Ξ Odium Ξ Enmity ~ ░▌ ╣
╣▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀╠
╬╩╦╩╦╩╦╩╦╩╦╩╦╩╦╩╦╩╦╩╦╩╦╩╬

Elymn

< Swift Kill >

Icecrown

10. Re: Warrior t10 set contains questionable ima 10/09/2009 09:24:35 AM PDT

Might as well ban all polearms while we are at it.

Minyin

< Cessation >

Medivh

11. Re: Warrior t10 set contains questionable ima 10/09/2009 09:25:10 AM PDT

Q u o t e:
hi im 12 and what is that?

It's your teacher telling you to close this window and pay attention in class.

Lyraesel

< Vinii Vidi Vici >

Shattered Halls

12. Re: Warrior t10 set contains questionable ima 10/09/2009 09:25:24 AM PDT

OMG Have you seen the little mermaid cover?!

http://www.animatedbuzz.com/WB/images/coverart01.jpg

Bornakk

Blizzard Poster

13. Re: Warrior t10 set contains questionable ima 10/09/2009 09:26:11 AM PDT

Q u o t e:
Blizzard has recently given us a sneak preview of the new warrior t10 sets and I know I can't be the only one who thought they looked a little off. You be the judge:

blizzard page of the preview(note the shoulders):
http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/underdev/3p3/tier10sneak.html

zoomed in version:
http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/5097/warriort10.jpg

There are children that play this game and I think blizzard really should re-design these shoulders, they are not appropriate.

I'm honestly not sure what you are seeing in this armor set. We have heard of things like this in past but we understand people will see what they want to see in designs. I see something in the design myself but I don't see how it's questionable.

Currently we have no plans to alter the models for this set.

Shark.

Gremik

< Demonic Disorder >

Stormrage

15. Re: Warrior t10 set contains questionable ima 10/09/2009 09:27:01 AM PDT

Huh? not sure what im supposed to see in that picture.

Ënmity

< Imperium >

Borean Tundra

16. Re: Warrior t10 set contains questionable ima 10/09/2009 09:27:31 AM PDT

Q u o t e:
we understand people will see what they want to see in designs.

OMG hahaha. So true.

Lyraesel

< Vinii Vidi Vici >

Shattered Halls

17. Re: Warrior t10 set contains questionable ima 10/09/2009 09:28:35 AM PDT

From the side view of the armor, I see a boar snout and it's tusks...

Darkehoofe

< The Cereal Killers >

Akama

18. Re: Warrior t10 set contains questionable ima 10/09/2009 09:28:41 AM PDT

He's implying that the tusks on the shoulders appear to be slightly similar to a portion of male anatomy.....it's a stretch....a horrible stretch. I'm guessing any protrusion could be construed in the same manner.

Darkehoofe: I wish I could Death Grip out of clouds :(
Humbull: The new resto Druid spell, LIFEGRIP! Using magical tentacles of the tree, LIFEGRIP pulls target out of the situation and heals them

Lucilius

< Eternity >

Alexstrasza

19. Re: Warrior t10 set contains questionable ima 10/09/2009 09:29:34 AM PDT

Q u o t e:
Blizzard has recently given us a sneak preview of the new warrior t10 sets and I know I can't be the only one who thought they looked a little off. You be the judge:

blizzard page of the preview(note the shoulders):
http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/underdev/3p3/tier10sneak.html

zoomed in version:
http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/5097/warriort10.jpg

There are children that play this game and I think blizzard really should re-design these shoulders, they are not appropriate.

Are you serious?....

Get out please..just do everyone a favor and go..

Kotiria
Lazur chikin - Melting your face! Pew pew pew

GENERAL DISCUSSION FORUM