Anything a feral druid wants in a weapon a hunter wants in a weapon.

so 1 spec of 1 class and 3 spec of another.

DKs could tank with it, Arms Warriors might even want it if it has ArPen on it.

---

Q u o t e:


Actually, Hunters did get a Legendary in BC.

http://static.mmo-champion.com/mmoc/images/news/2008/may/thoridalfinal.jpg

Caster DPS hasn't had one recently if at all really, which is why they decided to go with something new.

---

I was making an attempt at sarcasm ^_^

---

Q u o t e:
Anyone capable of using a two-handed axe can use Shadowmourne.

The stat allocation may not benefit hunters or shamans as much as warriors, DKs or paladins.

---

So why exactly did you make it an Axe instead of a Mace?

If it was a Mace, Warriors, DKs, Paladins, and Druids could use it.

---

Q u o t e:
Anyone capable of using a two-handed axe can use Shadowmourne.

The stat allocation may not benefit hunters or shamans as much as warriors, DKs or paladins.

---

+awesome is good for any class. l2p

---

Q u o t e:
So why exactly did you make it an Axe instead of a Mace?

If it was a Mace, Warriors, DKs, Paladins, and Druids could use it.

---

Because Axes are cooler? Because it was just implied that this will be a str weapon, which a druid isn't really going to want anyway?

Axe Specialization is why.

---

Q u o t e:


DK's are a class and are the new class this expansion and the whole expansion revolves around them and their contributions (i'm talking about lore, not supposed blizzard favoritism with class balance). It makes sense that DK's would get their own legendary.

"Ferals" are a spec of a class that has already received two legendary and are getting the next legendary early in the expansion. I understand you mean a weapon that ferals could use but it's 1 spec for 1 class that had other options. I'm not saying ferals shouldn't get one (in fact I think they should) but the likelihood of that happening is probably on par with the government suddenly deciding not to tax you this year.

---

Well, class favoritism has been pretty apparent this expansion. They made every effort to err on the side of "OP" with the new class...and they've gotten what they wanted. Anyways, there won't be some legendary that only DKs can use despite what I'm sure some designers would like to see.

That said, all I'm saying is that all they have to do is make it a polearm to include another hybrid dps spec. I don't see the problem (besides lore that doesn't exist). Do you?

---

Q u o t e:
So why exactly did you make it an Axe instead of a Mace?

If it was a Mace, Warriors, DKs, Paladins, and Druids could use it.

---

Because there has already been a legendary 2H Mace.

I guess no expansion is complete without a legendary that a warrior can use, huh.

---

Q u o t e:

Now that gets me curious. I thought Shamans were designed around dual wielding?

---

They are, however Shamans are 'capable' to use a two-hander Axe.

---

Q u o t e:
Now that gets me curious. I thought Shamans were designed around dual wielding?

---

That's why it wouldn't benefit Enhancement :)

Probably just a comment since we are, ultimately, capable of using it (even if it's not a good idea to do so).

---

Q u o t e:

Because it totally matters right because 2h axes are limited to warriors?

---

R.I.P. Frostmourne, may you rest in peace in the hands of GM's much like the beloved Ashbringer.