World of Warcraft - English (NA) Forums -> Worgen pet. dev please respond!

Zarhym

Blizzard Poster

20. Re: Worgen pet. 07/07/2009 03:49:24 PM PDT

The worgen should not technically belong to any of the pet families and was therefore removed. This means the pet no longer has access to pet talents or abilities. Whether or not similar circumstances with hunter pets in the past have occurred isn't really relevant. Given the nature of the creature that was tamed in this case, we feel it should not belong to any of the eligible pet families from which a hunter can choose his or her combat companion.

Another day, worthless prey
Wilting hearts translucent thin
Another bag of empty skin goes straight through the air
Like a balloon let go of

Willyprocit

Magtheridon

21. Re: Worgen pet. DEV PLEASE RESPOND!!!!! 07/07/2009 03:49:28 PM PDT

Q u o t e:

A Hunter controls a worgen. The worgen is a humanoid race. Slavery is bad.

I think this will get through to them, maybe.

Or maybe the CM post that slipped in there.

[ Post edited by Willyprocit ]

Q u o t e:
I don't want to hurt her feelings in the process, so I just want to seem like I died or something.

- Cyck

Ranzer

< Tortured Fate >

Lightninghoof

22. Re: Worgen pet. DEV PLEASE RESPOND!!!!! 07/07/2009 03:50:11 PM PDT

Q u o t e:
has no abilities or an achievement tree

Damn, son. All mine had was a talent tree. /jealous

Stop whining about it. From Wryxian:

Q u o t e:
Just wanting to confirm this in blue. As for details on the next step, if any, I do not have any information to share on this as yet.

They're obviously still deciding on whether or not we can actually use these guys in game. For now, consider it a gift that they didn't just take it away from you.

And by the way, I happen to have one, and you don't see me whining in CAPS LOCK about it. Grow a pair, or let the ones you have drop a bit more.

Kamillia

< Corpse Run >

Mok'Nathal

24. Re: Worgen pet. DEV PLEASE RESPOND!!!!! 07/07/2009 03:51:24 PM PDT

Q u o t e:

A Hunter controls a worgen. The worgen is a humanoid race. Slavery is bad.

I think you forgot that this is just a game. Your logic is flawed, that is not why they changed it how they did. I'm waiting to see if they post their reasons. It's a double standard to allow others who tamed a pet that was "not intended" to be tamed, and not everyone. The lolore ppl need to get a life.

Oh well. In the stable mine goes, he's now just for novelty.

edit: typo

[ Post edited by Kamillia ]

I didn't hit you...I simply high-fived your face.

http://omgitspins.ytmnd.com/

Heffaid

< Perpetual Onslaught >

Destromath

25. Re: Worgen pet. 07/07/2009 03:51:38 PM PDT

I thought CMs didn't respond to posts with 'DEV PLEASE RESPOND' and the like in the title...

Warkip

< Wrath Dynasty >

Aerie Peak

27. Re: Worgen pet. DEV PLEASE RESPOND!!!!! 07/07/2009 03:52:25 PM PDT

Wait, so, it's still usable as a trophy pet, but would be a waste in a raid environment?

That's actually a cool idea, I hadn't thought of it that way. It's basically a friend, not a bodyguard. He's a humanoid, thus smart enough to go "eh, ya got me, I'll be your friend, but don't expect me to be there for you."

INTERNAL MEMO FROM: Kil'jaeden
TO: Illidan Stormrage, Kael'thas Sunstrider, Lady Vashj
RE: 25 Annoying People

Anyone ever try killing those guys with the glowy hands in the back first?

Bookie

< Bringer of Doom >

Feathermoon

28. Re: Worgen pet. DEV PLEASE RESPOND!!!!! 07/07/2009 03:52:26 PM PDT

Q u o t e:

A slime is just a very large simple celled organism.

Did you learn that in RP biology class at Bloodhoof Elementary? How do you know how many cells a slime has in it? And what does it have to do with anything anyway?

Kamillia

< Corpse Run >

Mok'Nathal

29. Re: Worgen pet. 07/07/2009 03:53:41 PM PDT

Q u o t e:
The worgen should not technically belong to any of the pet families and was therefore removed. This means the pet no longer has access to pet talents or abilities. Whether or not similar circumstances with hunter pets in the past have occurred isn't really relevant. Given the nature of the creature that was tamed in this case, we feel it should not belong to any of the eligible pet families from which a hunter can choose his or her combat companion.

I can accept that. But I would almost rather have it taken away fully, but I guess it's nice to have as a novelty.

I didn't hit you...I simply high-fived your face.

http://omgitspins.ytmnd.com/

Bookie

< Bringer of Doom >

Feathermoon

30. Re: Worgen pet. 07/07/2009 03:55:21 PM PDT

Q u o t e:
I would almost rather have it taken away fully

Abandon pet IMO

Darish

< Sorbocles >

Saurfang

31. Re: Worgen pet. 07/07/2009 03:56:28 PM PDT

Q u o t e:
The worgen should not technically belong to any of the pet families and was therefore removed. This means the pet no longer has access to pet talents or abilities. Whether or not similar circumstances with hunter pets in the past have occurred isn't really relevant. Given the nature of the creature that was tamed in this case, we feel it should not belong to any of the eligible pet families from which a hunter can choose his or her combat companion.

That was a long, drawn out way of just saying "This shouldn't have been possible."

Matanuska

Hellscream

33. Re: Worgen pet. DEV PLEASE RESPOND!!!!! 07/07/2009 03:57:39 PM PDT

Q u o t e:
Did you learn that in RP biology class at Bloodhoof Elementary? How do you know how many cells a slime has in it? And what does it have to do with anything anyway?

It has to do with the person I quoted making up excuses for why other pets shouldn't be allowed. And the information comes from both lore supplements outside the game and several quests where research is done on slimes.

http://www.wowwiki.com/Chemist_Fuely

Pinonior

Draka

34. Re: Worgen pet. 07/07/2009 03:57:53 PM PDT

Grigen

Whisperwind

35. Re: Worgen pet. DEV PLEASE RESPOND!!!!! 07/07/2009 03:58:59 PM PDT

Q u o t e:

I think you forgot that this is just a game. Your logic is flawed, that is not why they changed it how they did. I'm waiting to see if they post their reasons. It's a double standard to allow others who tamed a pet that was "not intended" to be tamed, and not everyone. The lolore ppl need to get a life.

Oh well. In the stable mine goes, he's now just for novelty.

edit: typo

FAIL

saying that comment=invalid point automatically

Piker

Anub'arak

36. Re: Worgen pet. 07/07/2009 03:59:15 PM PDT

Q u o t e:
The worgen should not technically belong to any of the pet families and was therefore removed. This means the pet no longer has access to pet talents or abilities. Whether or not similar circumstances with hunter pets in the past have occurred isn't really relevant. Given the nature of the creature that was tamed in this case, we feel it should not belong to any of the eligible pet families from which a hunter can choose his or her combat companion.

I guess it took you guys the time wording this statement that should have went into actually deciding its fate. It sounds like there was no chance that we could keep the worgen as a viable skin and yet you could have just told us that days ago.

Norkol

< Deàths Door >

Nathrezim

37. Re: Worgen pet. 07/07/2009 03:59:41 PM PDT

Q u o t e:
The worgen should not technically belong to any of the pet families and was therefore removed. This means the pet no longer has access to pet talents or abilities. Whether or not similar circumstances with hunter pets in the past have occurred isn't really relevant. Given the nature of the creature that was tamed in this case, we feel it should not belong to any of the eligible pet families from which a hunter can choose his or her combat companion.

The Worgen is an evolved creature from a wolf. He was even programmed with the wolf talents and everything.

Using your logic, please tell me what a "Ooze" is, and how other pets are not relevant?

80 Death Knight.....71 Hunter
80 Rogue..............70 Warrior
80 Warlock............68 Priest
74 Druid................64 Mage
72 Paladin.............62 Shaman

Alliene

< Agony >

Spirestone

38. Re: Worgen pet. 07/07/2009 03:59:55 PM PDT

Sigh

Alliene-80 shaman (main)
Legata-70 priest, Surrender - 70 rogue
Andante - 71 warlock, Remeras - 70 mage
Entangled - 71 druid, Decaying - 80 death knight

Thoridin

< Demise >

Aggramar

39. Re: Worgen pet. DEV PLEASE RESPOND!!!!! 07/07/2009 04:00:07 PM PDT

Q u o t e:
Hunters weren't meant to have humanoid pets.

What about Gorilla's? they are technically humaniod it is just the game does not label them that way. But they are just the same as a worgen it is only the label that is different. Personally I don't care one way or the other I just wanted to make that point.

I am the Thread Killer - Yeah Me!

GENERAL DISCUSSION FORUM