Not just shadow priests either. If you did something like that for the mage Q&A, there wouldnt be as many people upset I think. You answered very specific questions instead of shot gunning a certain issue and most of answers were short and sweet. The questions asked were all really good ones too, and the fact you responded in black and white (questions answered with a "yes" or "no") was a lot easier to understand than having a paragraph basically saying "yes" or "no."


Please, I beg you, try to stick to that kind state of mind that you were in when you answered that spriest post.

I caught a bass but then I released it because I respect my fish.

---

Q u o t e:
I caught a bass but then I released it because I respect my fish.

---

They don't taste good anyways

---

Q u o t e:


They don't taste good anyways

---

You have to gut them first, then sear them over an open flame.

i made the thread ^^ forumpolice trolled me and i got a blue response ha :D

And GC what you did made many people happy, and i think now the shadow priest community will be able to hold over until the actual Q&A

---

Q u o t e:
I understand that, but that was still one set of long questions from one player on one spec of one class and I have a day job. :)

---

For the next QAs consider doing both sets. A broad, bigger picture set of answers and then the bullet point precise set of answers. Pleases a great deal more people (except your sleept cycle) that way.

---

Q u o t e:
And GC what you did made many people happy, and i think now the shadow priest community will be able to hold over until the actual Q&A

---

Word.

<3

---

Q u o t e:
I understand that, but that was still one set of long questions from one player on one spec of one class and I have a day job. :)

---

WARRIORS NEXT PLEASE lol

---

Q u o t e:
t. The questions asked were all really good ones too, and the fact you responded in black and white (questions answered with a "yes" or "no")

---

There was a "yes" in there? All I saw was, no, no, no, no.

---

Q u o t e:
I understand that, but that was still one set of long questions from one player on one spec of one class and I have a day job. :)

---

I thought your day job was to cater to our every whim. :P

---

Q u o t e:
I understand that, but that was still one set of long questions from one player on one spec of one class and I have a day job. :)

---

Ghost Crawler needs go be given Mirror Images in 3.2.

[Not Tracked]

first

This means you answer my class Q&A now right right?!

As disappointed with the mage Q/A as I was, GC is right - be gracious when they actually give real answers.

---

Q u o t e:
As to the Q&As, we tried to answer broad topics rather than select say 20 questions out of the hundreds we got, but if the community is happier with narrower, more specific questions, maybe that's the direction we'll take future Q&As. It just may mean none of the specific things you're interested in get addressed.

---

From my experience, people would appreciate much narrower and specific questions and responses better. If it's too broad (aka the Mage Q&A) it feels like nothing was answered.

Specific questions and answers feel like they have more substance to me and are much more clear-cut. People don't like wishy-washy answers that can be interpreted many ways, although I understand you can't speak on behalf of all Blizzard and say "We ARE going to do X" all the time. The community would appreciate it if you could try your best to answer specific questions as clearly as possible and give us insight as to your feelings on the matter or any ideas you devs are allowed to share with us. It also really helps to know WHY you don't do certain things, like making Fade remove movement impairing effects and such. It helps aim future forum discussion in the appropriate direction instead of keeping the community hanging onto hopeless dreams of specific buffs or changes that may never come to be.