Q u o t e: A. He's a Developer. An unusually talkative one, but a dev nonetheless.
B. ???
C. I see no Priest Q&A?
Damage dealing forum had a makeshift Q&A answered by GC recently for shadow priests especially, likely to hold over the whining shadow priest community until the real one came out.
Q u o t e: Damage dealing forum had a makeshift Q&A answered by GC recently for shadow priests especially, likely to hold over the whining shadow priest community until the real one came out.
Oh... I see. He answered both honestly and from the heart.
I guess that means he's an idiot that doesn't know what he's talking about.
(Except for the fact that he plays a Shadow Priest.)
Heh. No. It gets worse than that actually. Scroll around the damage dealing forum and find the non-blue tagged Q&A thread. Two pages long by now I believe. (/snicker. It got locked)
Then you'll find out just how much of a bad idea it was for him to answer it.
Edit: In there, you'll also see about 10-15 members of the shadow priest community all holding up "OH YES PLEASE BAN ME IN THE FACE" signs.
Q u o t e: Sometimes I wonder if I ought to encourage people who think doing something stupid is a good idea. The gene pool is in sore need of cleaning up.
The gene pool is a filthy dirty mess.
And I wouldn't have it any other way.
...(>'o')> (::) <('o'<)...
The Cult of Cookies
http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/funny-pictures-cat-is-innocent-and-hurt.jpg
Q u o t e: No. He would ban you because you're breaking forum CoC by launching a direct attack on a Blizzard Employee on a Blizzard-run forum. It's one thing to trash the game and parent companies, but it's expressly stated in the CoC that saying "<Employee>" is an idiot and should be fired" is akin to walking up to a violent psychotic and calling them crazy.
They usually say, "Thanks." when I call them that.
...(>'o')> (::) <('o'<)...
The Cult of Cookies
http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/funny-pictures-cat-is-innocent-and-hurt.jpg