World of Warcraft

1 . 2 . 3
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Dunemaul
  • 0. GC's QnA - Part 2   06/19/2009 11:15:50 AM PDT
quote reply
This link was brought to my attention by Wyln in the first QnA topic, but I figured more people would see it this way:

http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=17899801584&pageNo=1&sid=1#8

http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Dunemaul&n=Virsath
~~ Unban Lhivera ~~
Blizzard Entertainment
View All Posts by This User ignore-inactive
Zarhym
Blizzard Poster
  • 1. Re: GC's QnA - Part 2   06/19/2009 01:37:33 PM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:

http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=17899801584&pageNo=1&sid=1#8

For those dissatisfied with the Q&A posted last night, this is a good thread to check out, as Ghostcrawler continues a bit of the dialog found in the Q&A.

I was put in a round room
And told to sit in the corner
While they washed my brain
With a dirty rag...
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 3. Re: GC's QnA - Part 2   06/19/2009 01:50:49 PM PDT
quote reply
Go there!

If I cared what you think of my gear/spec/rating/achievements I would post on an alt.
"Pace Yourselves" -- GC
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 5. Re: GC's QnA - Part 2   06/19/2009 01:53:08 PM PDT
quote reply
Xodok, you and Kyth are fighting the good fight, keep it up.

80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 6. Re: GC's QnA - Part 2   06/19/2009 01:58:32 PM PDT
quote reply
Ty ^_^

Although all the issues listed and all the suggestions made are not that new and exciting. So many mages raised similar issues and posted similar suggestions before that it makes me sad every time I do it again and nothing is being changed :D

If I cared what you think of my gear/spec/rating/achievements I would post on an alt.
"Pace Yourselves" -- GC
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Tortheldrin
  • 7. Re: GC's QnA - Part 2   06/19/2009 02:19:25 PM PDT
quote reply
Wow.

Um.

Hm.

I did not expect this.

Sorry GC and thanks for answering more questions, especially the ones we've been asking.

Hate Blizzard? Stop paying them to play their game.
Hate Kalgan or GC? Stop paying them to play their game.
Hate the game? Stop playing. Do something else.

It's a video game. Calm down.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 8. Re: GC's QnA - Part 2   06/19/2009 03:05:21 PM PDT
quote reply
Seriously? All he basically said was Mages are "fine" L2P

[ Post edited by Lingerié ]

3
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Shadowmoon
  • 9. Re: GC's QnA - Part 2   06/19/2009 03:19:46 PM PDT
quote reply
Still not a word about scorch, combustion, or evocation.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 10. Re: GC's QnA - Part 2   06/19/2009 03:20:57 PM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:
Seriously? All he basically said was Mages are "fine" L2P



Totally agree. This wasn't any different. He basically rehashed what was said before, and gave zero insight to anything at all that would be happening. Probably because it isn't happening because apparently we're "fine" which is not accurate in the slightest.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 11. Re: GC's QnA - Part 2   06/19/2009 03:33:37 PM PDT
quote reply
yup, to every single question he said "mages are fine", he even agreed that we have problem with long fights and all fights and hard modes tends to take more than 10 minutes, so we are simple going to sit out .....

its funny how he simple changed the subject on the question that we had average low dps in most fight and we dont have a CD to do burst

Hi i am a signature
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Wyrmrest Accord
  • 13. Re: GC's QnA - Part 2   06/19/2009 03:54:09 PM PDT
quote reply
Well, that's a good start. It's certainly a better rendition than what we've got stickied right no.

I still feel there's a lot that hasn't been touched on and there's still a lot of issues with the class that weren't addressed.

http://us.blizzard.com/support/article.xml?articleId=20458 - Roleplaying Policy
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Dunemaul
  • 14. Re: GC's QnA - Part 2   06/19/2009 03:57:07 PM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:
Seriously? All he basically said was Mages are "fine" L2P

Take a hint?

http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.xml?r=Dunemaul&n=Virsath
~~ Unban Lhivera ~~
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 15. Re: GC's QnA - Part 2   06/19/2009 04:00:17 PM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:

For those dissatisfied with the Q&A posted last night, this is a good thread to check out, as Ghostcrawler continues a bit of the dialog found in the Q&A.



O, so you mean he is answering all the questions you should have answered last night?



Q u o t e:
I tried. Leveling a caster is the closest thing to jumping off a bridge all depressed, but falling upwards.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 16. Re: GC's QnA - Part 2   06/19/2009 04:07:47 PM PDT
quote reply
I don't understand why you guys are still dodging the Torment the Weak question. We are perfectly fine with it being a mandatory talent, we just don't like that it's a mandatory talent you have to waste points in other things to get. The first tier of arcane offers absolutely nothing to help the other trees. IMO Arcane Subtlelty should reduce ALL threat by 20-30% instead of just arcane by 40%.

boner
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 17. Re: GC's QnA - Part 2   06/19/2009 04:08:44 PM PDT
quote reply
C'mon guys, you're being too harsh. They fixed frost PVE. Since you run out of mana now more easily with the other specs, you must pace yourself and do less dps. Bamm! frost is suddenly more viable.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Lightbringer
  • 18. Re: GC's QnA - Part 2   06/19/2009 04:12:45 PM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:

For those dissatisfied with the Q&A posted last night, this is a good thread to check out, as Ghostcrawler continues a bit of the dialog found in the Q&A.


WHAT ABOUT IGNITE MUNCHING

Mith is an exploiting slore with all the charm and social grace of a rabid dog. His inability to play this game fairly and as intended is matched only by his cowardice in the face of his betters.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Wyrmrest Accord
  • 19. Re: GC's QnA - Part 2   06/19/2009 04:12:51 PM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:
I don't understand why you guys are still dodging the Torment the Weak question. We are perfectly fine with it being a mandatory talent, we just don't like that it's a mandatory talent you have to waste points in other things to get. The first tier of arcane offers absolutely nothing to help the other trees. IMO Arcane Subtlelty should reduce ALL threat by 20-30% instead of just arcane by 40%.


Yeah.

I personally find it phenomenal that he was actually so dense as to get it wrong TWICE.

TTW is fine being a mandatory raid talent.

Having to pick up completely useless, and I mean COMPLETELY useless talents to get there is not.

Many other classes, namely rogues, paladins, death knights, and druids can multi-tree and always get a good benefit. Mages literally have to waste talent points.

TTW is not a 3-point talent. It is an 8 point talent, because 5 talent points(and you could argue 6) are literally, absolutely wasted.

http://us.blizzard.com/support/article.xml?articleId=20458 - Roleplaying Policy
1 . 2 . 3
Forum Nav : Jump To This Forum
Blizzard Entertainment