World of Warcraft

1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 . 10
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Bonechewer
  • 20. Re: AV was fine!   09/26/2007 09:14:10 AM PDT
quote reply
Saying the solo van pull negates all the extra npc's we have to deal with is not true. Many horde players have no idea how to do the pulls correctly (lack of experience) much less know how to pull off that exploit. I was tanking av yesterday pulling the marshalls and the whole team is right next to me in the keep. Needless to say that whirlwinds killed a lot of people but we still won every game.
70
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 21. Re: AV was fine!   09/26/2007 09:15:58 AM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:
well lets be honest, each racial lends itself to either pve or pvp, it just so happends that horde racials lend to pvp, while most alliance lends to pve (barring gnome which is the most overpowered pvp racial for a war, but moving on). thats how blizz does balance, unless you want everyone to be the same (which i really dont care) then thats what we have to work with. by the same token alliance racials help for pve, which if you want to raid, is a distinct advantage, as some horde racials are for pvp. however i dont think this means horde is going to win av because of it.


But the question is: why do horde racials get to be more geared towards PvP? Some of the Horde elitists seem to think it's our punishment for picking a "pretty race". How is that fair, or even make sense?

If you stick 10 alliance versus 10 horde. Same classes. Same gear. Same skill level. That's when the racials come into play.

The racials aren't an "IWIN" button for horde. They're an "IHAVEADISTINCTADVANTAGE" button. And I don't necessarily mean battle winning; but you notice the pain in the ass it is to crowd control undead; how you can't seem to friggin stun an orc like you can a tauren, or any of the ally races.

If PvP is about competition and skill, which so many PvP elitists of both factions claim it is: if you want to brandish your e-peen and show how leet you are at PvP, then you should want a balanced playing field. Giving one faction an edge via racials imbalances things.

No, it's not going to hand a faction a battleground. But it does give them an advantage.


OPINIONS CAN BE OBJECTIVELY DEFINED AND THEIR VALIDITY CAN BE EMPIRCALLY MEASURED BY THE EQUATION: MINE > YOURS
It's true cuz its in caps
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Nathrezim
  • 23. Re: AV was fine!   09/26/2007 10:33:52 AM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:
Not trying to be a troll....just more of a Noob at AV.

Why is the map not balanced?

The bridge.

This thread is terrible.
Blizzard Entertainment
View All Posts by This User ignore-inactive
Nethaera
Blizzard Poster
  • 25. Re: AV was fine!   09/26/2007 02:41:54 PM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:
I'm glad that the people are actually being forced to play. Good Job thier blizzard.

It was never about map imbalances as most horde would come on here and QQ about. It was the simple fact that we had 10-20 people sitting afk in the cave.

The map is fine...crying about how we have more mobs to pull when we get across the bridge is stupid when we can just single pull Vann.

I've played both sides and both horde and ally have advantages, only thing is the horde players are a bunch of whinners when they lose at a bg.


We do have more changes slated for AV that we'll be talking about at a later point in time. The AFK reporting is just one part of the changes.

We also are making it possible to buff in Battlegrounds the same as you do in the Arena. You'll be able to buff for free prior to the BG starting and also for a short period after being resurrected by a Spirit Guide. This is slated for the 2.3 patch along with more changes to AV. Hopefully, everyone will get into the PTR when it goes up and test out all of the changes and let us know how it feels.

We are definitely glad that the AFK reporting seems to be inspiring more people to not AFK in AV right now though.

"I meant," said Ipslore bitterly, "what is there in this world that truly makes living worthwhile?"
Death thought about it.
"Cats," he said eventually. "Cats are nice."
Terry Pratchett, Sourcery
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 26. Re: AV was fine!   09/26/2007 02:44:36 PM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:


We do have more changes slated for AV that we'll be talking about at a later point in time. The AFK reporting is just one part of the changes.

We also are making it possible to buff in Battlegrounds the same as you do in the Arena. You'll be able to buff for free prior to the BG starting and also for a short period after being resurrected by a Spirit Guide. This is slated for the 2.3 patch along with more changes to AV. Hopefully, everyone will get into the PTR when it goes up and test out all of the changes and let us know how it feels.

We are definitely glad that the AFK reporting seems to be inspiring more people to not AFK in AV right now though.


Free buffs. Awesome.
70
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 27. Re: AV was fine!   09/26/2007 02:45:57 PM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:


We do have more changes slated for AV that we'll be talking about at a later point in time. The AFK reporting is just one part of the changes.

We also are making it possible to buff in Battlegrounds the same as you do in the Arena. You'll be able to buff for free prior to the BG starting and also for a short period after being resurrected by a Spirit Guide. This is slated for the 2.3 patch along with more changes to AV. Hopefully, everyone will get into the PTR when it goes up and test out all of the changes and let us know how it feels.

We are definitely glad that the AFK reporting seems to be inspiring more people to not AFK in AV right now though.




It has been a nice change to see the bots purple gaining no honor.
21
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 28. Re: AV was fine!   09/26/2007 02:51:06 PM PDT
quote reply
av changes sound good, too bad your arena ones are stupid
29
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Kul Tiras
  • 29. Re: AV was fine!   09/26/2007 02:56:22 PM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:
It has been a nice change to see the bots purple gaining no honor.

Ya its cool right now. Most are scared, you've got a few who buck the system. Like most are saying, lets see what happens in a week.
70
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 31. Re: AV was fine!   09/26/2007 03:09:53 PM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:
Horde are more agressive therefore they have more agressive racials. Alliance are more defensive therefore they have more defensive racials. And to all of you that think racials make that much of a difference STFU.

Why is it fair that it takes me twice as long to get my netherdrake then humans or how is it fair that a human can see rogues easier? Just get over it.


I realize that I'm no master at Theory Craft, but how does a 10% boost to my rep gains equate to my rep building at twice the rate as yours?

Also, wherein exactly are you getting this notion that Horde are more "agressive" (sic) than Alliance?

Finally, I shall be quick to point out that a Netherdrake is really a luxury. You can get epic flying mounts through the same way I can, at the same speed. However, if Horde racials contribute to them dominating the Battlegrounds, that means they'll get honor quicker than alliance, they will get the best PvP gear faster than Alliance; which is actually a necessity, not a luxury.

[ Post edited by Lukin ]


OPINIONS CAN BE OBJECTIVELY DEFINED AND THEIR VALIDITY CAN BE EMPIRCALLY MEASURED BY THE EQUATION: MINE > YOURS
It's true cuz its in caps
70
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 32. Re: AV was fine!   09/26/2007 03:10:06 PM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:


Horde are more agressive therefore they have more agressive racials. Alliance are more defensive therefore they have more defensive racials. And to all of you that think racials make that much of a difference STFU.

Why is it fair that it takes me twice as long to get my netherdrake then humans or how is it fair that a human can see rogues easier? Just get over it.


Wait, did you just agree that the alliance base is more defensive while all of the horde bases are more offensive? hmm.
60
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Frostwolf
  • 33. Re: AV was fine!   09/26/2007 03:11:31 PM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:

But the question is: why do horde racials get to be more geared towards PvP?


You mean like Stoneform and Escape Artist?
70
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Silver Hand
  • 34. Re: AV was fine!   09/26/2007 03:12:54 PM PDT
quote reply
I laugh at the Horde when they say AV's terrain is unbalanced, do you not understand the choke points? Put 5-10 horde near Galv(which the Alliance cannot live without) and wait for the pull, go in and take out their healers and rinse repeat as you die. You rez at IB and the Alliance rezzes in their home base which basically puts 90% of all Alliance on defense, then you push them back. Most of the time the Allliance never recovers.

If a strong force gets through to IB and takes it the next choke point is in your base, there are several doorways, towers etc. to attack from and should be able to slow their assault. Frost traps anyone? Frost nova mages?

The mere fact that that most horde refuse to either defend or are too ignorant to defend is does not mean that the map is unbalanced. Use the terrain that's there, each sides choke points are different but can't be used effectively either way.

The closer it gets to WoW's new expansion release and the nearer we get to WAR and AoC's release you will notice that WoW's developer's will suddenly come up with all new 'ideas'....hmmm
70
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 35. Re: AV was fine!   09/26/2007 03:14:17 PM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:
You mean like Stoneform and Escape Artist?


Now go over the rest of both lists.

OPINIONS CAN BE OBJECTIVELY DEFINED AND THEIR VALIDITY CAN BE EMPIRCALLY MEASURED BY THE EQUATION: MINE > YOURS
It's true cuz its in caps
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 36. Re: AV was fine!   09/26/2007 03:16:47 PM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:



We also are making it possible to buff in Battlegrounds the same as you do in the Arena. You'll be able to buff for free prior to the BG starting and also for a short period after being resurrected by a Spirit Guide.


Thank you very much for this one. buff + sit and drink was a real buzzkill.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Detheroc
  • 37. Re: AV was fine!   09/26/2007 03:16:54 PM PDT
quote reply
There are imbalances in every BG, but to say that there is a map imbalance for alliance in AV is just crazy. I win 75% of the games I am in and every time horde get their bunker and their gy before we have even started on the Lt outside of Galv. It is obvious that horde have a shorter distance to their places then alliance. The only reason we manage to catch up is because we SKIP galv, and horde don't skip Belinda. Not to mention you guys have a better vantage point at the first gy to defend then allaince. We have only way way to IB gy, were as horde have two.

AV isn't the only place were horde have an advantage, AB and WSG has things. Bottom line horde whine and complain and Blizzard caters to them, why - becuase there are more horde then alliance period, and the developers are in love with their horde.

We all know horde have pvp racials and alliance have pve....where was the logic in that blizz?



-Tillie (aka Zalie)

You know you love me!
70
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Sisters of Elune
  • 38. Re: AV was fine!   09/26/2007 03:24:42 PM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:
We also are making it possible to buff in Battlegrounds the same as you do in the Arena. You'll be able to buff for free prior to the BG starting and also for a short period after being resurrected by a Spirit Guide. This is slated for the 2.3 patch along with more changes to AV.


I like this idea. I think it gives more motivation to buff others, and indirectly promoting teamwork. Thank you! :-)

What are we going to do tonight, Brain?
Same thing we do every night, Pinky. Try to take over the World... of Warcraft.


Druid Healing: http://img258.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fullnd9.jpg
21
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 39. Re: AV was fine!   09/26/2007 03:29:34 PM PDT
quote reply

Q u o t e:
There are imbalances in every BG, but to say that there is a map imbalance for alliance in AV is just crazy. I win 75% of the games I am in and every time horde get their bunker and their gy before we have even started on the Lt outside of Galv. It is obvious that horde have a shorter distance to their places then alliance. The only reason we manage to catch up is because we SKIP galv, and horde don't skip Belinda. Not to mention you guys have a better vantage point at the first gy to defend then allaince. We have only way way to IB gy, were as horde have two.

AV isn't the only place were horde have an advantage, AB and WSG has things. Bottom line horde whine and complain and Blizzard caters to them, why - becuase there are more horde then alliance period, and the developers are in love with their horde.

We all know horde have pvp racials and alliance have pve....where was the logic in that blizz?





lol, alliance have the better map for av. wsg and ab are the same
1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 . 10
Forum Nav : Jump To This Forum
Blizzard Entertainment