World of Warcraft

  • Blizzard Response
  • General Thread
  •  Topic Lol@GC
  •   |  11/21/2009 02:48:10 PM PST 
1 . 2 . 3 . 4
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 0. lol@GC   01/05/2009 12:05:29 PM PST
quote reply
It took you 150+ pages over six weeks in the epic warlock dev-failure thread to realize that the whole thing plus your lack of response was making you look like a jerk.

Please report any abuse of Ghostcrawler's rights on these forums to wowcmfeedback@blizzard.com.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Greymane
  • 2. Re: lol@GC   01/05/2009 12:12:37 PM PST
quote reply
Did I miss something...?

"The Warlock numbers are prety L-o-L tho. It takes truely inspired game design to botch a classes ability to play that badly." -- Thanatosia
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 5. Re: lol@GC   01/05/2009 12:17:52 PM PST
quote reply

Q u o t e:
It took you 150+ pages over six weeks in the epic warlock dev-failure thread to realize that the whole thing plus your lack of response was making you look like a jerk.



You sir are emo because you like the game. Please stop before it's too late!
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 6. Re: lol@GC   01/05/2009 12:19:07 PM PST
quote reply

Q u o t e:
It took you 150+ pages over six weeks in the epic warlock dev-failure thread to realize that the whole thing plus your lack of response was making you look like a jerk.



He made many responses to Warlocks, including that they are looking at implementing all the warlock changes in one massive push. How is that a lack of a response?

On the forums, your PvP flag is always on.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 7. Re: lol@GC   01/05/2009 12:22:16 PM PST
quote reply

Q u o t e:
Did I miss something...?


GC quietly locked the "Warlock Arena issues" thread that was at over 150 pages today after realizing how ugly it really was.

Please report any abuse of Ghostcrawler's rights on these forums to wowcmfeedback@blizzard.com.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Greymane
  • 8. Re: lol@GC   01/05/2009 12:27:50 PM PST
quote reply
Ahh thank you. Didn't notice that.

EDIT: Actually looking at the thread, I don't think it was locked. It just hit 3000 posts (LOL) and I think it needs to be manually reopened again. There's no little lock symbol on it.

[ Post edited by Oppai ]


"The Warlock numbers are prety L-o-L tho. It takes truely inspired game design to botch a classes ability to play that badly." -- Thanatosia
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Warsong
  • 9. Re: lol@GC   01/05/2009 12:30:02 PM PST
quote reply

Q u o t e:
perhaps he finds his 15$ a month more useful on the forums instead of the game


i just refuse to pvp until they fix it, that's how ill contribute to their "data collection" perhaps no warlocks is a sign... 1000's of posts don't seem to cut it.

thankfully i prefer pve over pvp, but i started a ret pally so i can compete in World of Meleecraft once more...


You started the wrong class.

Mage, rogue. Best two options there are, best two options there have been.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
Psi
  • Mug'thol
  • 10. Re: lol@GC   01/05/2009 12:44:25 PM PST
quote reply

Q u o t e:


GC quietly locked the "Warlock Arena issues" thread that was at over 150 pages today after realizing how ugly it really was.
He didn't quietly lock ##*@.
It capped at 3k posts.
Are you expecting him to sit around every large thread going "is it capped yet? ... now? ... OK THERE IT IS *BAM UNLOCKED*"

You guys are jumping the gun on this one.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 11. Re: lol@GC   01/05/2009 12:46:44 PM PST
quote reply

Q u o t e:
He didn't quietly lock ##*@.
It capped at 3k posts.
Are you expecting him to sit around every large thread going "is it capped yet? ... now? ... OK THERE IT IS *BAM UNLOCKED*"

You guys are jumping the gun on this one.


This.

No mercy, no remorse.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 12. Re: lol@GC   01/05/2009 02:26:46 PM PST
quote reply

Q u o t e:
He didn't quietly lock ##*@.
It capped at 3k posts.
Are you expecting him to sit around every large thread going "is it capped yet? ... now? ... OK THERE IT IS *BAM UNLOCKED*"

You guys are jumping the gun on this one.


Really think so? Take a look at a couple of things. First, check out how many threads are recently locked in these forums. Then take a look at any thread that's past 3 or 4 pages and see how many posts in that thread have been deleted by looking at the gaps in the post numbers. He's sitting here spending his day locking and deleting.

Please report any abuse of Ghostcrawler's rights on these forums to wowcmfeedback@blizzard.com.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 13. Re: lol@GC   01/05/2009 02:29:37 PM PST
quote reply
Locks were on cruise control all through TBC. Time to start thinking about how to play again.

If you want to play a class that never gets touched switch to a druid or a rogue or resign yourself to the fact the every now ant then Blizz is gonna make changes to your class that you are not going to like.


p.s. Lock are still very dangerous class when played right. It is just a matter of re-learning what works and what does not.

[ Post edited by Resiprocity ]

1
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Blackrock
  • 14. Re: lol@GC   01/05/2009 02:32:49 PM PST
quote reply

Q u o t e:
Lock were on cruise control all through TBC. Time to start thinking about how to play again.


Instant damage was what made druids and warlocks good in TBC. Now every class can do way better instant damage, without having that little "OVER TIME" element to it.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Bleeding Hollow
  • 15. Re: lol@GC   01/05/2009 02:37:53 PM PST
quote reply

Q u o t e:
Locks were on cruise control all through TBC. Time to start thinking about how to play again.

If you want to play a class that never gets touched switch to a druid or a rogue or resign yourself to the fact the every now ant then Blizz is gonna make changes to your class that you are not going to like.


p.s. Lock are still very dangerous class when played right. It is just a matter of re-learning what works and what does not.


Rerolling works.

Getting gibbed in 1.5 seconds (3 against a single opponent) does not.


Q u o t e:
Killing a healer, even in the absence of crowd control, silences or whatever, still needs to be a viable tactic at the end of the day.


Top THAT.
Blizzard Entertainment
View All Posts by This User ignore-inactive
Ghostcrawler
Blizzard Poster
  • 16. Re: lol@GC   01/05/2009 03:33:58 PM PST
quote reply
Conspiracy post is conspiratorial.

I have kept up with that thread, though as I have said before, I'm not sure how effective a mode of communication that has turned out to be. I would be surprised if many other players read the entire thing. I don't think it's helpful to try and measure the severity of a problem by the post count. I certainly don't want the impression that our solution to warlock concerns is to launch a titanic thread. Nevertheless, I will extend the limit again if you really feel you have something important to say that hasn't been said yet.

We have some plans in mind for the next major patch, and I appreciate the players that have given us feedback now and in beta. We made a lot of changes for locks in Lich King. I'm sorry we couldn't get to more changes but we will. Our opinion is never going to be that a class is "done." WoW just isn't like that.
30
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Zuluhed
  • 17. Re: lol@GC   01/05/2009 03:36:30 PM PST
quote reply

Q u o t e:
Conspiracy post is conspiratorial.

I have kept up with that thread, though as I have said before, I'm not sure how effective a mode of communication that has turned out to be. I would be surprised if many other players read the entire thing. I don't think it's helpful to try and measure the severity of a problem by the post count. I certainly don't want the impression that our solution to warlock concerns is to launch a titanic thread. Nevertheless, I will extend the limit again if you really feel you have something important to say that hasn't been said yet.

We have some plans in mind for the next major patch, and I appreciate the players that have given us feedback now and in beta. We made a lot of changes for locks in Lich King. I'm sorry we couldn't get to more changes but we will. Our opinion is never going to be that a class is "done." WoW just isn't like that.


That's great.

Now fix warriors.
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • Greymane
  • 18. Re: lol@GC   01/05/2009 03:37:20 PM PST
quote reply
Honestly GC I think most of the locks are pretty lukewarm about keeping that thread open too. There's a Warlock Arena Issues 2 thread that got bumped and proceeded to drop off the front page fast. I say just leave the thing closed.

"The Warlock numbers are prety L-o-L tho. It takes truely inspired game design to botch a classes ability to play that badly." -- Thanatosia
80
View All Posts by This User Toggle Ignore / Unignore This User
  • 19. Re: lol@GC   01/05/2009 03:37:58 PM PST
quote reply
I must agree with the level 30 priest. GC. Please. I'll make you breakfast every morning for a year.

[ Post edited by Vigkvagk ]


Saurfang has infinite talent points. He's spent 20.
If you somehow managed to polymorph Saurfang, you'd be the first person in WoW to be killed by a sheep
1 . 2 . 3 . 4
Forum Nav : Jump To This Forum
Blizzard Entertainment